tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5661485732522434738.post2709959507626474710..comments2008-01-15T12:20:47.726-08:00Comments on NC MS HS Best Books Committee: Publication Range for Booksbmannhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07243801734090211442noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5661485732522434738.post-23426810235350618762008-01-07T09:59:00.000-08:002008-01-07T09:59:00.000-08:00Good point, ignore the comment on the later date.R...Good point, ignore the comment on the later date.<BR/><BR/>Robinrejordanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10709134099028715991noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5661485732522434738.post-66024812730717436912007-12-07T14:10:00.000-08:002007-12-07T14:10:00.000-08:00I think 2005 - 2008 gives us enough range, even if...I think 2005 - 2008 gives us enough range, even if we do miss some really good earlier titles. By limiting the total number of titles we will have to cut good books whatever the date range is.14thebookshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07822223596307458430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5661485732522434738.post-66623048625393717042007-12-07T08:08:00.000-08:002007-12-07T08:08:00.000-08:00Let's react to using 2005-2008 titles. Are there ...Let's react to using 2005-2008 titles. Are there important books we would miss not going back to 2004?Mary Janehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07004185891630230910noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5661485732522434738.post-11535982582380267802007-12-06T15:57:00.000-08:002007-12-06T15:57:00.000-08:00I agree with the above. Include some a bit older ...I agree with the above. Include some a bit older but with a lot of appeal and also some new releases.<BR/><BR/>Everyone in agreement about the publication date of titles to be included on the list?<BR/><BR/>Q 2. - Will we allow books that have already won awards or honors or been on a BOB list?bmannhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07243801734090211442noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5661485732522434738.post-26293148106657629562007-12-05T19:12:00.000-08:002007-12-05T19:12:00.000-08:00I agree that for the first year it might benefit u...I agree that for the first year it might benefit us to include some highly talked about favorites to our list in order to get some notice and draw in the kids a little quicker this first time. But I also think we should include some newer ones that the kids might not have heard of yet.Joannhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12931502413707265708noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5661485732522434738.post-80755555864350044752007-12-05T05:54:00.000-08:002007-12-05T05:54:00.000-08:00Hmmm. My instinct is to keep the books as current...Hmmm. <BR/><BR/>My instinct is to keep the books as current as possible... but perhaps we could widen the field for the first year. It seems odd to always have the books be from the last 3-4 years. What does everyone else think?librarylagardehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07847087944421548668noreply@blogger.com